Tucker Carlson Slams Pam Bondi Over Controversial Epstein Files Claims
In a new interview with NBC News, conservative commentator Tucker Carlson took aim at former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, accusing her of spreading “ludicrous” and unfounded claims about the long-sought-after Epstein files. Carlson suggested Bondi’s public statements have fueled unnecessary outrage and confusion about what the Department of Justice actually possesses regarding the late Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged sex trafficking operation.
Carlson, who has long questioned the official narrative surrounding Epstein’s death and the secrecy of the government’s investigation, told NBC, “I don’t think the DOJ has much meaningful information about Epstein’s crimes that the public doesn’t already know. But instead of saying that plainly, Pam Bondi went on TV and made wild claims she couldn’t prove. That’s what got us here.”
The controversy stems from Bondi’s earlier appearances on cable news where she claimed to have access to critical evidence, including a so-called “Epstein client list” and hours of unreleased video footage. But in a turn of events last week, Bondi admitted that such a list doesn’t exist and clarified that the videos she referenced would never be released due to their graphic nature involving minors.
Her statements triggered backlash from across the political spectrum, including Trump supporters who believed her initial remarks pointed to bombshell revelations. President Trump has stood by Bondi, calling her performance “fantastic” in a post on Truth Social. “We’re on one team—MAGA—and I don’t like what’s happening,” Trump wrote. “We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and selfish people are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein.”
The administration had previously stoked speculation further. In March, 15 far-right media influencers were invited to the White House and given white binders labeled “The Epstein Files: Phase 1.” But critics quickly noted that the materials inside were already publicly available, leading to questions about the legitimacy and purpose of the presentation.
Bondi has since tried to clarify her statements, saying that she misunderstood what she was given. She said she had been led to believe the binders included exclusive content and that a whistleblower suggested more materials were still out there. In a follow-up interview, she downplayed earlier remarks, saying she was speaking broadly about documents related to Epstein’s case—not a specific client list.
As calls for transparency in the Epstein case continue, some Trump allies worry the confusion over Bondi’s claims could undermine trust in the administration. Others argue the entire episode has become a distraction from the broader policy agenda.
While Carlson’s criticism has added fuel to the fire, many in Trump’s orbit are working to contain the fallout. Still, skepticism remains high, especially among voters who feel they were misled into believing a major revelation was imminent.
As pressure builds, the public is left wondering if there’s truly more to uncover—or if the Epstein case has become a political football, kicked back and forth with little regard for truth or justice.
